If you have received a traffic ticket, or “citation,” accusing you of violating any one of North Carolina’s many traffic laws, you may be tempted to simply pay the citation and consider the matter resolved. What many people fail to realize is that by paying the citation, you are making a legal admission of guilt.
Under North Carolina law, there are many traffic tickets that can result in the accumulation of points with your insurance company and the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), including the following:
- Speeding tickets;
- Speeding in a work or school zone;
- Failure to obey traffic signals;
- Unsafe movements;
- Following too closely;
- Making an improper lane change or turn;
- Failure to yield;
- Running a stop sign;
- Running a red light;
- Failure to reduce speed;
- No driver’s license; and,
If you are convicted or plead guilty to a traffic citation, points will be applied to your driving record for a period of time. The more points that accumulate on your driving record, the more you can expect to pay in insurance premiums, and the more likely your driving privileges may be suspended or revoked by the DMV.
The outcome in your case will depend on many factors, such as, driving history, traffic citation(s) received, and the charging officer’s account of events. In addition to these legal considerations, other factors can often make just as much of a difference, such as the local prosecutors’ particular inclinations, policies, and procedures, all of which differ from county to county and from one prosecutor to another.
Our team of criminal defense attorneys is armed with unique insight and particularized knowledge accumulated over many years of practice in and around Wake County. Our familiarity and history with the prosecutors can make all the difference in assisting you. We are able to present the facts of your case in the most favorable light based upon the legal circumstances and local customs. In every case, it is our goal to keep points from accumulating on your driving record. We can also appear in court on your behalf whenever possible to save you the time and expense of missing work.
At DeMent Askew & Johnson, we have over 40 years of experience and a team of defense attorneys who have decades of experience in practicing criminal law in and around Wake County. We will thoroughly evaluate your case and put our years of experience to work for all traffic citations that you are faced with. Call us today for a free consultation with one of our criminal defense attorneys at 919-833-5555.
Russell W. DeMent III
Criminal Defense Lawyer
Russell W. DeMent III
Criminal Defense Lawyer
Criminal Law Articles from the Blog
CONNECT WITH US
AVAILABLE AT 9AM TO 6PM
333 Fayetteville Street, #1513
Raleigh, NC 27601-2950
CRIMINAL DEFENSE SUCCESS
Client stopped for speeding. LEO smelled odor of MJ about clients person. LEO search revealed burned MJ blunt. Defendant performed poorly on all physical tests but told the officer he suffered from a herniated disk in his lower back. On the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) eye test there were no clues of impairment. A subsequent…
Defendant charged with Level 2 DWI with one prior within 7 years. Was facing a potential sentence of 1 year in prison. Defendant attended a treatment program and really changed her life direction while the case was pending. We were able to get the judge to agree to accept the inpatient treatment as credit for…
Client approaches a DWI roadblock. Smells of alcohol and performs ok on field tests though she does so some signs of NHTSA clues of impairment. She admits to drinking and blows positive for presence of alchol on the portable breath test. She is taken to the mobile breath testing bus at the checkpoint. She is…
Defendant charged with 2 counts of habitual impaired driving on his 7th total offense. Were able to negotiate a plea consolidating the sentence to one term of 28 months in prison where he was facing the potential for 10 years or more.
Defendant had a head-on collision with injuries to both parties. He was given field sobriety tests on the scene of the collision and did not perform well on those tests with the exception of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test where he showed no signs of impairment from any central nervous system depressant. He admitted…
Not Guilty of DWI with Serious Collision; LEO Failed to Gather Specific Information from Driver Taken to Hospital with BAC of .17
Client charged with driving while impaired. LEOs respond to a serious collision where someone being taken to the hospital in EMS vehicle upon troopers arrival. The vehicle had flipped 2 times and landed in the median. Based upon information obtained at the scene, the LEO finds my client in the hospital with injuries consistent with…
Motion to Suppress and Dismiss Granted for Lack of Probable Cause; No Reliable Evidence Suggesting Impairment After Speeding Stop
Motion to suppress and dismiss granted for lack of probable cause to arrest where my client was stopped for speeding, had an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, admitted to drinking, as well as showed signs of impairment on the field sobriety tests. The court put little weight on the field sobriety tests because the officer…
Evidence Suppressed in DWI Case; Court Holds “No Reasonable and Articulable Suspicion” for Traffic Stop
All evidence suppressed in DWI case for an illegal stop where the LEO observed my client pause in a parking lot for 30 seconds before leaving the lot and then crossed a center line during a turn at an intersection. Held “No reasonable and articulable suspicion” for a traffic stop.
Guilty Verdict of Less Significant Charges of Driving with License Revoked and Lane Violation; Charges Included DWI, Driving While License Revoked, and Hit and Run; No Jail Time
Client charged with DWI, driving while license revoked for impaired revocation, hit and run, and driving left of center. She was found on side of the road in driver’s seat 400 yards from a collision, showed clues of impairment on the field sobriety tests and blew a .10 on the breath test. Found not guilty…
Client charged with level 3 trafficking in opiates which carried minimum mandatory sentencing of a minimum of 225 months (18 years 9 months) in prison. After months of negotiating with the prosecuting attorney and following a lengthy argument to the court, Defendant was sentenced to 65 months (5 years and 5 months) in prison with…